SWU collected participatory evaluation data from students in the Safety Communicator Workshop to analyze traffic risk points across 19 physical locations on campus. Safety surveillance levels were categorized based on cumulative student group ratings into four tiers: Very High Risk (27 points), High Risk (24–26 points), Moderate Risk (19–23 points), and Low Risk (<18 points).
Overall Campus Assessment Summary & Distribution (19 Locations Total)
Very High Risk (ระดับสูงมาก): 2 locations (10.5%)
High Risk (ระดับสูง): 4 locations (21.1%)
Moderate Risk (ระดับปานกลาง): 10 locations (52.6%)
Low Risk (ระดับต่ำ): 3 locations (15.8%)
Key Surveillance Locations & Risk Classification
Critical Surveillance Hotspots (Very High Risk):
Entrance/Exit Ramp - Underground Parking at D promenade Gate (ทางขึ้น-ลง ที่จอดรถใต้ดิน ประตูดนตรีอโศก): 28 points
Entrance/Exit Ramp - Underground Parking at Gate 2 (ทางขึ้น-ลง ที่จอดรถใต้ดิน ประตู 2): 27 points
High-Risk Locations (High Surveillance Needed):
Moderate-Risk Locations (10 Areas):
Crosswalk in front of Savings Cooperative (ทางม้าลายหน้าสหกรณ์ออมทรัพย์): 23 points
Three-way Junction in front of COSCI Building (สามแยกหน้าตึก COSCI): 23 points
Road behind Classroom Building (ถนนหลังตึกเรียนรวม): 22 points
Road in front of Prasarnmit Demonstration School - Secondary (ถนนหน้าสาธิต มศว ฝ่ายมัธยม): 21 points
Gate 5 (ประตู 5): 21 points
Entrance/Exit Ramp - Underground Parking in front of Central Library (ทางขึ้น-ลง ที่จอดรถใต้ดิน หน้าหอสมุด): 21 points
Road behind Khai Dao Building (ถนนหลังตึกไข่ดาว): 20 points
Road beside 15 Pre-clinic Building (ถนนข้างอาคาร 15 พรีคลินิก): 20 points
Road between Central Library & Classroom Building (ถนนระหว่างหอสมุดและตึกเรียนรวม): 20 points
Noodle Shop Alley (ซอยก๋วยเตี๋ยวรู): 19 points
Low-Risk Locations (3 Areas):
Crosswalk in front of Ho Phra (ทางม้าลายหน้าหอพระ): 16 points
Road in front of Classroom Building (ถนนหน้าตึกเรียนรวม): 16 points
SWU Garden Area (ถนนบริเวณ SWU Garden): 11 points
Identified Environmental Safety Issues & Improvement Needs
Lighting Improvements (ความต้องการแสงสว่างเพิ่มเติม): Most evaluated areas expressed a strong need for improved lighting, particularly at pedestrian crossings, narrow alleys, and road/pathways between buildings.
Traffic Hazards: Identified hazard types across evaluated zones include blind spots (จุดอับสายตา), slippery/uneven road surfaces (พื้นลื่น), lack of clear traffic signs (ต้องการทางป้ายสาย), and poor nighttime illumination.
High-Density Zones: Major surveillance areas are concentrated in high-pedestrian and heavy-vehicle traffic locations (such as Gate 2 and D promenade Gate).
Figure 1: Road Safety Assessment within the University Infographic detailing the 19 evaluated campus locations, risk scoring breakdowns, traffic hazard icons, and high-surveillance hotspot maps.
Source: Safety Communicator Workshop: Data Storytelling for Road Safety Campaign Report (April 8, 2026) – https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AAZ2xTKSg/
Executive Summary Prose
Srinakharinwirot University (SWU) is fully committed to enhancing campus traffic safety and minimizing road accident risks in alignment with the Healthy University Framework. To systematically identify high-risk traffic points and gather real-world user feedback, SWU organized the "Safety Communicator Workshop: Data Storytelling for Road Safety Campaign" on April 8, 2026. Participating student groups conducted spatial safety evaluations across 19 campus locations, scoring and classifying surveillance levels from low to very high risk. The assessment revealed that over 50% of the surveyed areas fall into the moderate risk category, with primary concerns centered on high-traffic locations, underground parking ramps, blind spots, and insufficient lighting along pedestrian crossings and narrow alleys. These empirical findings provide actionable data for targeted infrastructural enhancements and campus road safety advocacy.